• Register
  • Login
  • العربیة

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences

  1. Home
  2. clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

About Journal

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs

    Authors

    • Asmaa A. Darwish 1
    • Mohamed F. Eldakroury 2

    1 Animal and Poultry Health Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

    2 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Matrouh University, Matrouh, Egypt

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.33899/ijvs.2023.136587.2595
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • Highlights
  • Full Text
  • Export Citation
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Levamisole, BCG, vitamin E & Selenium are traditional immunopotentiating agents. This study aimed to monitor and compare between their effects on some clinicopathological and immunological parameters. For this purpose, sixty clinically-healthy 6-months Barki male lambs were equally divided into three groups: The first group was injected S/C with l ml of levapan®10% /50kg B.Wt (100 mg of levamisole) for 3 consecutive days, while the second group was injected S/C with 0.1 ml of BCG vaccine, and the third group was injected S/C for one time with E and Se 0.5 ml /10 kg B. Wt. Blood samples were collected at 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 35 days. Clinicopathological and immunological parameters were estimated and statistically analyzed. The three groups displayed a significant enhancement in the estimated immunological parameters (elevated neutrophils count, neutrophils phagocytic activity and index, globulin, and acute phase proteins), but the BCG group had the highest degree of immunopotentiating action for a longer time. The E and Se group and levamisole group were almost equal. On the other hand, the erthyrogram, total antioxidant capacity, liver and kidney functions with the BCG, and levamisole groups were negatively affected, while they were enhanced in the E and Se group for 14 days. In addition, the iron profile showed significant hypoferremia, hypotransferrinemia, and hyperferritinemia with the BCG group, and non-significant changes with both, the levamisole and E and Se groups. We concluded that the BCG has a powerful and sustainable immunomodulatory effect and it is recommended to inject it combined with E and Se to avoid its side effects.

Keywords

  • Hematology
  • Biochemistry
  • BCG
  • Levamisole
  • vitamin E

Main Subjects

  • Veterinary Clinical Pathology

Highlights

  1. Levamisole, BCG, and Vit E+Se are important immunostimulants in veterinary medicine.
  2. Among them, BCG has the most powerful persistent effect on innate immunity.
  3. The side effect of BCG on the iron profile, liver, and kidney may be avoided by its combination with E+Se.

Full Text

Introduction

 

Recently, Immunostimulants attracted many researchers' attention, in both human and animal medicine. They were prescribed as a part of different treatment and prophylactic programs due to their magical effects on the immune system (1-4). Levamisole, the levorotatory isomer of tetramisole, is one of these immunostimulants. Its action was approved as anthelmintic, anti-rheumatic, adjuvant, antibacterial, and antiviral for animals and humans, as well. It non-specifically improves innate and adaptive immunity resulting in the augmentation of antibodies formation, T-cell activation, proliferation, phagocytosis, and chemotaxis by monocyte and macrophage and neutrophils mobility, adherence, and chemotaxis (2). In human medicine, levamisole was helpful for patients suffering from malignant conditions, autoimmune diseases, and covid-19 (2,5). In veterinary medicine, it reduced the severity of endometritis in repeat breeder cows (6) and enhanced the body responses against FMD and PPR vaccines in sheep and goats (7,8). In fish and poultry industries, it is widely used to potentiate the innate immune response, inhibit cortisol increase in stressed fish, decrease mortality, boost productivity, and improve the vaccination action (9,10). Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is another immunostimulant, mainly used for protection against tuberculosis in human medicine and some researchers referred to its immunopotentiating effect against some non-mycobacterium infections as well as some neoplasms (3). In veterinary practice, the BCG vaccine was used for the immunization of small ruminants against Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. BCG also has a protective effect against some pathological conditions such as equine endometritis, equine sarcoid tumor, ocular squamous cell carcinoma in cows, and upper respiratory tract infections in horses (11). Furthermore, it maximizes the immunogenicity of sheep to the Brucella vaccine Rev.1 (12). Vitamins and trace elements are another group of immunostimulants. They were recommended by physicians and veterinaries to raise the host`s resistance to different infections. Among them, vitamin E and Selenium (E and Se) combination, as Vit E was known for its potent antioxidant, anti-sterility, and anti-inflammatory action. Selenium is an important cofactor in the synthesis of glutathione peroxidase enzyme (GPx), which is responsible for the neutralization of the lipid peroxidation products and protecting the cells from their harmful oxidative action (4,13). In veterinary medicine, using Vit E and/ or Se, parenterally or in oral supplementation before parturition increased GPx activity, neutrophils phagocytic index, and metabolic activity index in the pregnant ewe. It also reduces the stillbirth rate, retained placenta, and clinical mastitis in ewe and cattle (1,14,15). E and Se improves the reproductive performance of ewes, and lamb growth and increases fertility and metabolic rates, if given before breeding season (16,17). Vit E and/ or Se decrease the adverse effects of the high heat load and enhance the antibody titer against the Clostridium tetani and Clostridium perfringens vaccine in sheep (18,19).

          Although, levamisole, BCG, and E and Se are widely used in sheep husbandry, there is only a little information about their effect on the hematological and biochemical parameters, acute phase response, and iron profile in sheep. Hence, this study aimed to study their effect on some hematological and biochemical parameters, and acute phase response of Barki lambs with special reference to their effect on iron profile.

 

Materials and methods

 

Animals’ groups

After the ethical approval of the animal and poultry health department, animal and poultry health division, DRC, Egypt; sixty clinically healthy Barki lambs, aged 6 months were selected for the study. They were clinically examined and the parasitic load was determined according to Jackson (20), then were housed in closed pens in the Sustainable Development Centre of Matrouh Resources Farm, subjected to a proper nutrition system and environmental conditions. They were divided equally into 3 groups: The first group: 20 lambs were injected subcutaneously for 3 consecutive days, with l ml of levapan® 10% (Parma swede-Egypt) /50kg B.Wt (100 mg of levamisole), then, the second group: 20 lambs were injected S/C with 0.1 ml of BCG vaccine supplied by the veterinary serum and vaccine research institute, El Sekka El Beda St., Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt, and the third group: 20 lambs were injected subcutaneously for one time, with 0.5 ml /10 kg B. Wt. E and Se (ADWIA Co, Egypt). Each ml contains 150 mg vit. E and 1.67 mg Se. All doses and routes of administration are recommended by the manufacturing company.

 

Blood samples

5 ml blood were collected from the jugular vein of each animal using a clean sterile vacutainer tube before drug injection (0 day) and at the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th, and 35th days after injection, then divided into 3 parts: 1st part: 1 ml of blood was collected on anticoagulant (EDTA) and was used instantly for evaluation of different hematological parameters (red blood cells count (RBCs), hemoglobin concentration (Hb), packed cell volume (PCV), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), total leukocytic count (TLC) and differential leukocytic count, (DLC)) (21). 2nd part: 1 ml of blood was placed in a tube containing heparin and was used immediately for the estimation of neutrophils phagocytic activity following (22). 3rd part: 3 ml of blood was placed in a clean plain tube and was left to coagulate then was centrifuged at 3000 r.p.m for 20 min and serum was separated in clean Eppendorf tubes and was used for the estimation of different biochemical parameters (total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), globulin (Glob), liver enzymes (alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), kidney function tests (urea, creatinine (Cr)), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), serum iron (SI), total iron binding capacity (TIBC)), spectrophotometrically using commercial kits of Biodiagnostic® Company, following the manual instructions. Plasma fibrinogen (Fb), serum amyloid A (SAA), and serum haptoglobin (Hp) were determined using ELISA kits of IBL International Crop (Canada)®. Serum ferritin was measured by the CLIA method using Abnova® (Taipei) kits. Serum caeruloplasmin (Cp) and serum transferrin (Tf) were estimated by the turbidimetric method using Elabscience USA® kits. Transferrin saturation percent (TF sat. %) = SI/TIBC*100. Unsaturated iron binding capacity (UIBC) = TIBC-SI.

 

Ethical approval

The research was conducted according to the ethical committee of the faculty of medicine, Alexandria University No. 0305895.

 

Statistical analysis

Means of different statistical parameters among the different animal groups were compared via two-way ANOVA test using SPSS version 24 at 0.05 level of probability.

 

Results

 

Levamisole administration caused a significant decrease in RBCs, Hb, and PCV on the 3rd day with non-significant changes in MCV, MCH, and MCHC. While, TLC, neutrophils, Phagocytic index of neutrophils, TP, Glob, liver function tests (ALT, AST, ALP), kidney function tests (urea, creatinine), and acute phase proteins (Fb, Hp, SAA, Cp) significantly increased till reaching their peaks at the 14th day, then started decreasing returning to their 0-day values at the 35th day. Contrariwise, Alb, A/G, and TAC significantly declined, achieving their lowest values on the 14th day and then raised approaching their baseline values on the 35th day for Alb but A/G and TAC didn`t achieve theirs. Non-significant (P≥0.05) changes were determined in the iron profile. BCG group results displayed a significant reduction in RBCs, and Hb (peaks at 14th), PCV (lowest values were at 3rd, 7th), MCV (lowest values at 3rd day), MCH (lowest values at 7th day), then they started increasing towards 0-day values till the end of the experiment, but they didn`t score it. MCHC significantly increased on the 3rd day then significantly decreased till the 35th day and didn`t return to its original values. On the other hand, TLC, neutrophils, phagocytic activity and index of neutrophils, Tp, Glob, liver enzymatic activity, kidney function tests (urea, creatinine (Cr)) and APPs (Fb, Hp, SAA, Cp), TIBC, UIBC, ferritin significantly elevated till reaching their peaks at the 14th day, then downregulating towards their primary values, but they didn`t reach them. While, Alb, A/G, TAC, SI, Tf, and Tf sat significantly decreased till the 14th day, then began to elevate approaching their 0-day value, but didn`t reach them. E and Se group showed a significant raise in RBCs, Hb, MCH, and MCHC on the 3rd and 7th days, PCV demonstrated a significant increase on the 3rd day then decreased on the 7th day but still higher than the 0-day values. All of them returned to their initial values on the 14th day. E and Se group presented a significant increase in TLC, neutrophils, phagocytic activity and index of neutrophils, TP, Glob, and a significant decrease in A/G but they reached their peaks at the 14th day, then achieving their primary values at the end of the experiment. TAC significantly increased in the 3rd, and 7th days and reached normal values on the 14th day. Liver enzymatic activities significantly decreased on the 3rd and 7th days, then returned to their initial values on the 14th day. Non-significant changes were detected in Alb, kidney function tests, AAPs, and iron profile throughout the study (Table 1-6).

 

Table 1: Red blood cell parameters in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

RBCs (×106/μl)D

Hb (g/dl)D

PCV (%)D

MCV (fl)D

MCH (pg)D

MCHC (%)D

0

LG

11.88±0.77d

13.62±0.88 d

33.01±0.85 d

27.88±1.80

11.47±0.30

41.29±2.76

BG

11.82±0.75d

13.71±0.84 d

33.07±0.96 d

28.07±1.70d

11.61±0.29d

41.49±2.68d

EG

11.82±0.75d

13.62±0.89 d

33.01±0.85d

28.01±1.73d

11.52±0.32d

41.28±2.80d

3

LG

10.72±0.52c

12.62±0.85c

31.01±0.85c

28.99±2.15

11.78±0.40

40.75±2.87

BG

9.28±0.38c

9.98±0.34c

23.53±0.64c

25.39±1.30c

10.76±0.35c

42.41±1.39c

EG

13.15±0.86c

15.80±0.86c

36.53±0.92c

27.70±2.37

12.00±0.18c

43.34±3.15c

7

LG

11.32±0.83

13.12±1.01

32.01±0.85

28.40±2.01

11.60±0.55

40.99±3.04

BG

9.22±0.40c

9.69±0.45c

23.53±1.46c

25.60±2.15c

10.52±0.46c

41.32±3.09c

EG

13.20±0.80c

15.96±0.91c

34.60±0.94c

27.97±1.65

12.12±0.21c

46.15±2.90c

14

LG

11.35±0.85

13.12±1.01

32.01±0.85

28.33±2.17

11.57±0.33

41.02±2.87

BG

9.15±0.46c

9.66±0.52c

25.20±0.77c

27.61±1.68c

10.56±0.45c

38.35±2.83c

EG

12.08±0.74

13.83±0.90

33.60±0.83

27.91±1.87

11.44±0.35

41.16±2.71

21

LG

11.65±0.85

13.12±0.88

32.01±0.85

27.60±2.06

11.27±0.31

41.02±2.87

BG

9.72±0.49c

10.73±0.50c

27.01±0.85c

27.62±1.86c

11.04±0.05c

39.75±2.05c

EG

12.05±0.86

13.83±0.77

33.33±0.82

27.78±1.85

11.49±0.27

41.51±2.19

28

LG

11.74±0.81

13.59±0.91

32.01±0.85

27.38±1.91

11.60±0.30

42.47±2.89

BG

10.62±0.49c

11.33±0.50c

29.33±0.82c

27.69±1.68c

10.67±0.03c

38.65±2.24c

EG

11.96±0.77

13.71±0.93

33.33±0.82

27.97±1.65

11.47±0.15

41.13±2.47

35

LG

11.82±0.83

13.59±0.91

32.01±0.85

27.19±1.93

11.50±0.36

42.47±2.89

BG

10.72±0.49c

11.53±0.50c

29.93±0.88c

27.99±1.69c

10.76±0.03c

38.55±2.25c

EG

11.96±0.7

13.71±0.93

33.33±0.82

27.97±1.65

11.47±0.15

41.13±2.47

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

Table 2: TLC, neutrophils, lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils and Basophils counts in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

TLC

(×103/μl)D

Neutrophils

(×103/μl)D

Lymphocytes

(×103/μl)

Monocytes (×103/μl)

Eosinophils (×103/μl)

Basophils (×103/μl)

0

LG

7.78±0.34d

4.20±0.29d

2.59±0.23

0.53±0.07

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

7.82±0.34d

4.18±0.23d

2.65±0.26

0.53±0.07

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

7.78±0.33d

4.22±0.23d

2.60±0.22

0.53±0.07

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

3

LG

7.93±0.38c

4.38±0.24c

2.56±0.28

0.53±0.08

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

9.83±040c

6.27±0.23c

2.56±0.27

0.53±0.08

0.42±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.28±0.37c

4.67±0.22c

2.59±0.21

0.53±0.08

0.44±0.06

0.04±.005

7

LG

8.32±0.30 c

4.77±0.16c

2.55±0.28

0.53±0.06

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

10.42±0.32c

6.87±0.08c

2.56±0.21

0.53±0.05

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.48±0.39c

4.89±0.19c

2.59±0.20

0.53±0.04

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

14

LG

8.49±0.31c

4.94±0.03c

2.53±0.27

0.53±0.04

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

10.49±0.29c

6.94±0.05c

2.50±0.27

0.53±0.06

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.61±0.33c

5.03±0.12c

2.52±0.21

0.53±0.05

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

21

LG

8.38±0.30c

4.84±0.06c

2.54±0.21

0.53±0.08

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

9.80±0.30c

6.25±0.02c

2.56±0.28

0.53±0.05

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.41±0.40c

4.82±0.20

2.59±0.24

0.53±0.08

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

28

LG

8.19±0.31c

4.63±0.04c

2.53±0.27

0.53±0.07

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

9.61±0.31c

6.06±0.04c

2.54±0.22

0.53±0.07

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.16±0.37c

4.57±0.16c

2.58±0.20

0.53±0.06

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

35

LG

8.00±0.31

4.45±0.02

2.59±0.27

0.53±0.07

0.43± 0.06

0.04±.005

BG

9.61±0.31c

6.06±0.04c

2.56±0.27

0.53±0.07

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

EG

8.06±0.29

4.47±0.08

2.59±0.24

0.53±0.07

0.43±0.06

0.04±.005

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

Table 3: Phagocytic activity, phagocytic index, TP, Alb, Blob, and A/G in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

Phagocytic activity (%)D

Phagocytic indexD

TP (g/dl)D

Alb (g/dl)D

Glob (g/dl)D

A/GD

0

LG

61.00±0.85

2.02±0.01d

6.45±0.16d

4.51±0.20d

1.94±0.18d

2.35±0.28d

BG

61.00±0.85d

2.02±0.01d

6.45±0.16d

4.53±0.19d

1.91±0.16d

2.39±0.25d

EG

61.00±0.85d

2.02±0.01 d

6.47±0.17d

4.53±0.26

1.94±0.24d

2.38±0.34d

3

LG

61.47±0.64

2.12±0.01c

6.84±0.16c

3.57±0.20c

3.27±0.27c

1.10±0.14c

BG

71.00±0.85c

3.03±0.04c

7.42±0.17c

3.05±0.02c

4.37±0.17c

0.70±0.03c

EG

61.93±0.80c

2.22±0.03c

7.05±0.02c

4.69±0.15

2.36±0.29c

1.99±0.19c

7

LG

61.47±0.64

2.12±0.03 c

7.07±0.03c

3.05±0.02c

4.02±0.04c

0.76±0.01c

BG

71.00±0.85c

3.03±0.04c

8.06±0.02c

2.51±0.08c

5.54±008c

0.45±0.02c

EG

61.93±0.80c

2.22±0.03c

7.44±0.21c

4.69±0.15

2.75±0.29c

1.72±0.22c

14

LG

61.46±0.63

22.22±0.03 c

7.48±0.04c

2.96±0.02c

4.52±0.04c

0.65±0.01c

BG

71.40±0.74c

3.16±0.10c

8.46±0.02c

1.95±0.02c

6.51±0.03c

0.30±0.01c

EG

62.13±1.13c

2.33±0.01c

7.45±0.21c

4.69±0.15

2.76±0.29c

1.71±0.22c

21

LG

61.07±0.80

2.12±0.03c

7.16±0.02c

3.06±0.02c

4.10±0.04c

0.75±0.01c

BG

71.01±0.85c

3.14±0.10c

8.15±0.03c

2.15±0.02c

6.00±0.04c

0.36±0.01c

EG

61.53±0.64c

2.23±0.01c

7.15±0.02c

4.69±0.15

2.47±0.16c

1.90±0.18c

28

LG

61.07±0.80

2.10±0.03 c

6.82±0.06c

3.58±0.04c

3.23±0.06c

1.11±0.51c

BG

66.01±1.70c

3.12±0.08c

7.85±0.03c

2.64±0.05c

5.21±0.07c

0.51±0.02c

EG

61.53±0.64c

2.13±0.02c

6.83±0.04c

4.69±0.15

2.15±0.17c

2.20±0.24c

35

LG

61.07±0.80

2.02±0.03

6.46±0.02

4.06±002

2.06±0.03

1.70±0.03c

BG

64.01±1.70c

3.00±0.05c

7.26±0.02c

2.64±0.05c

4.61±0.06c

0.57±0.02c

EG

61.03±0.64

2.03±0.02

6.46±0.02

4.69±0.15

2.05±0.17

2.30±0.24

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

Table 4: Concentration of AST, ALT, ALP, Urea, Cr, and TAC in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

AST (U/L)D

ALT (U/L)D

ALP (U/L)D

Urea (mg/dl)D

Cr (mg/dl)D

TAC (Mm/L)D

0

LG

30.60±1.88d

28.00±1.46d

24.40±3.48d

22.01±1.46d

1.40±0.23d

1.34±0.05d

BG

30.60±1.88d

28.00±1.46d

24.40±3.48d

22.00±1.46d

1.42±0.23d

1.34±0.05d

EG

30.60±1.88d

27.60±1.46d

24.16±3.66d

22.00±1.46

1.41±0.23

1.34±0.05d

3

LG

32.00±2.06c

30.87±1.51c

27.40±1.64c

25.20±1.65c

2.54±0.25c

0.87±0.01c

BG

39.67±2.38c

35.20±2.14c

36.35±2.33c

30.00±2.93c

3.01±0.15c

0.47±0.04c

EG

25.60±1.46c

24.27±0.85c

22.80±1.66c

21.07±1.16

1.48±0.22

2.05±0.02c

7

LG

34.03±0.88c

32.13±1.60c

29.87±1.41c

26.33±1.47c

3.32±0.21c

0.79±0.01c

BG

45.20±1.78c

40.01±1.69c

43.00±0.89c

38.80±2.24c

3.60±0.15c

0.39±0.02c

EG

27.40±1.46c

24.01±1.69c

22.40±1.69c

21.60±1.45

1.20±0.15

1.64±0.01c

14

LG

36.00±1.25c

34.01±1.69c

35.20±1.21c

30.13±1.76c

3.80±0.15 c

0.69±0.01c

BG

47.00±1.46c

42.00±1.69c

44.00±1.46c

42.00±1.69c

4.01±0.17c

0.38±0.02c

EG

30.26±1.78

27.60±1.69

23.40±1.69

23.20±2.95

1.58±0.16

1.51±0.07

21

LG

32.53±1.06 c

31.60±1.72c

27.67±1.70 c

26.20±2.67 c

3.49±0.24c

0.78±0.01c

BG

43.01±1.46c

38.00±1.69c

42.00±1.69c

38.00±1.69c

3.69±0.24c

0.65±0.02c

EG

30.26±085

27.60±1.69

23.86±0.89

23.20±2.99

1.20±0.17

1.49±0.07

28

LG

32.66±1.35c

30.13±1.55c

26.01±1.69c

23.40±0.82 c

2.60±1.69c

0.95±0.04c

BG

40.01±0.85c

35.00±0.85c

38.00±1.69c

32.00±1.69c

2.90±0.08c

0.78±0.02c

EG

30.60±0.85

27.66±1.70

23.86±1.69

23.20±2.37

1.40±0.17

1.49±0.07

35

LG

31.46±083

29.01±0.85

24.80±1.97

22.00±1.46

1.90±0.08

1.07±0.01c

BG

31.60±1.55c

32.13±1.30c

28.00±1.46c

25.60±2.41c

2.20±0.15c

0.97±0.01c

EG

30.60±0.85

27.60±0.85

23.86±0.85

23.20±1.69

1.70±0.08

1.49±0.07

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

Table 5: Concentration of acute phase proteins concentrations in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

Fb (mg/dl)D

Cp (mg/dl)D

Hp (g/dl)D

SAA (mg/L)D

0

LG

121.01±8.70d

2.32±1.19d

0.15±0.02d

2.30±0.15d

BG

121.67±4.08d

2.32±1.19d

0.15±0.02d

2.30±0.15d

EG

121.00±8.70

2.32±1.19

0.15±0.02

2.30±0.15

3

LG

150.01±7.32c

5.75±0.25c

0.40±0.15c

2.80±0.15c

BG

166.01±10.72c

6.93±0.33c

1.01±0.15c

3.71±0.35c

EG

122.01±7.32

2.43±0.25

0.25±0.15

2.40±0.17

7

LG

169.33±5.69c

6.73±0.24c

1.01±0.15c

3.48±0.21c

BG

192.33±5.94c

8.01±0.15c

1.60±0.15c

4.86±0.25c

EG

123.01±7.32

2.55±0.25

0.35±0.15

2.68±0.21

14

LG

186.01±2.93c

7.60±0.15c

1.60±0.19c

4.40±0.29c

BG

221.33±11.25c

8.60±0.15c

2.52±0.21c

5.80±0.29c

EG

124.01±1.69

2.68±0.15

0.38±0.15

2.80±0.29

21

LG

163.40±2.47c

5.91±0.20c

1.23±0.14c

3.66±0.25c

BG

192.00±5.61c

7.10±0.08c

1.80±0.15c

4.79±0.33c

EG

125.20±3.28

2.44±0.25

0.36±0.15

2.74±0.25

28

LG

143.40±247c

4.09±0.20c

0.80±0.15c

2.76±0.16c

BG

171.80±5.54c

4.68±0.21c

1.08±0.21c

3.66±0.25c

EG

124.40±3.48

2.40±0.15

0.28±015

2.60±0.15

35

LG

127.98±2.47

2.44±0.25

0.33±0.15

2.29±0.23

BG

132.53±9.05c

3.07±0.63c

0.47±0.21c

3.19±0.33c

EG

125.80±2.37

2.30±0.16

0.20±0.08

2.30±0.17

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

Table 6: Concentration of SI, TIBC, UIBC, Transferrin, Tf sat. %, and ferritin in LG, BCG, and E+Se groups

 

Day

Group

SI

(μg/dl)D

TIBC

(μg/dl)D

UIBC

(μg/dl)D

Transferrin

(mg/dl)D

Tf sat.

%D

Ferritin

(ng/ml)D

0

LG

107.56±2.66

327.50±212

219.93±2.40

124.40±2.47

33.00±1.00

13.60±1.06

BG

106.76±2.62d

327.43±2.25d

220.67±2.58d

125.40±3.38d

33.00±1.00d

13.67±1.11d

EG

107.68±2.08

327.41±1.89

219.74±1.16

124.40±2.47

33.00±1.00

13.60±1.06

3

LG

107.83±2.66

327.50±2.37

219.67±2.79

124.47±2.39

33.00±1.00

13.73±1.01

BG

96.90±1.67c

334.76±2.50c

237.87±2.95c

112.00±1.69c

29.00±1.00c

17.01±0.85c

EG

107.28±2.64

327.41±1.89

220.27±2.89

124.60±2.47

33.00±1.00

13.80±1.01

7

LG

107.00±2.80

328.03±2.29

220.13±2.42

124.53±2.17

33.00±1.00

13.87±0.99

BG

93.03±1.63c

341.90±2.30c

248.87±2.72c

106.33±1.29c

27.00±1.40c

20.01±0.85c

EG

107.90±2.71

327.55±2.16

220.13±3.13

124.93±2.15

33.00±1.00

13.93±1.28

14

LG

107.5±2.65

327.96±2.14

220.13±2.42

124.20±1.61

33.00±1.00

13.73±0.88

BG

87.83±1.74c

349.70±2.58c

261.87±2.95c

100.00±0.85c

25.00±1.00c

24.00±1.69c

EG

107.83±2.71

328.08±2.19

220.13±3.13

125.33±2.50

33.00±1.00

14.33±1.23

21

LG

107.05±2.44

327.83±2.04

219.80±2.46

124.53±1.68

33.00±1.00

13.53±1.06

BG

93.83±1.74c

344.25±1.77c

250.42±1.24c

105.00±0.85c

27.00±1.00c

21.87±1.06c

EG

108.03±2.71

328.08±2.19

220.13±3.32

124.93±2.31

33.00±1.00

14.20±1.42

28

LG

107.00±2.44

327.96±2.08

219.87±2.56

124.80±182

33.00±1.00

14.07±1.16

BG

98.23±1.10c

339.23±1.10c

241.01±1.51c

112.13±1.60c

29.00±1.00c

19.07±0.88c

EG

108.01±2.32

328.22±2.33

220.21±2.91

125.20±2.18

33.00±1.00

14.73±1.22

35

LG

106.00±2.06

328.03±1.91

220.07±1.98

124.00±2.01

33.00±1.00

13.93±0.96

BG

102.68±1.60c

335.58±0.92c

232.90±1.85c

118.60±1.99c

31.00±1.00c

16.93±0.96c

EG

108.00±1.89

328.22±2.11

219.68±1.85

125.20±2.18

33.00±1.00

14.73±1.22

D on the parameters (significant between the three drugs effect along the study), d on the 0 day value (the effect of the drug significant along the study in the same group), c (significant with the control group), significant when P˂0.05.

 

 The comparison among the studied immunostimulants showed that, BCG has the most powerful immunostimulant action, although the three groups displayed a significant elevation in TLC, neutrophils, neutrophils phagocytic activity and index, TP, Glob, and APPs, but these changes were superior and persistent in BCG group. While, levamisole and E and Se were almost equal, as these immunological parameters were slight better in the E and Se group than the levamisole group for 14 days, except globulin values were better in the levamisole group than the E and Se group and APPs significantly increased in Levamisole group and non-significantly changed in E and Se group. On the other hand, the erthyrogram, TAC, liver, and kidney functions of BCG and levamisole groups were negatively affected (in the BCG group more than the levamisole group) while, they were ameliorated in the E and Se group for 14 days. In addition, the iron profile of the BCG group was markedly affected and non-significantly changed in the levamisole and E and Se groups.

 

Discussion

 

The appearance of resistant strains of different pathogens and the antibiotic usage futility, steered the researchers' attention toward immunostimulants (3). Among them levamisole and BCG, which are potent immunostimulants widely used in human and animal medicine. According to the current data, both of them succeeded in improving the estimated immunity parameters. This was represented here by the neutrophilic leukocytosis and increased neutrophils phagocytic index, hyperglobulinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and increased APPs concentrations observed in levamisole and BCG groups, and the increased neutrophils phagocytic activity detected in BCG group only throughout the research.

The levamisole and BCG non-specific immunopotentiating effect was mainly attributed to their ability to enhance the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, TNF-γ) (2,3,23). The activation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines (by levamisole and BCG) evokes neutrophils maturation and release from bone marrow and increases their activity and function. Neutrophilic leukocytosis with enhanced activity and function was noticed before with levamisole administration by Refat (24), Sadigh-Eteghad (25), and BCG administration by Brook (26). The pro-inflammatory cytokines also stimulate immunoglobulin production (γ-globulin) and arrange acute phase response (α and β-globulin), leading to the outstanding hyperglobulinemia (and the subsequent hyperproteinemia and decreased A/G), hypoalbuminemia (negative acute phase reactant) and increased positive APPs (Fb, Hp, SAA, Cp) in levamisole and BCG groups along the research. Hyperglobulinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and acute phase response were recorded before with levamisole and BCG administrations by many authors (24,27-31). In addition, the pro-inflammatory cytokines increase free radicals’ formation and accumulation causing the oxidative stress noted in both groups (represented by the decreased TAC). Unfortunately, the accumulated free radicals attack liver and kidney cells leading to a prominent increase in the liver and kidney function tests in levamisole and BCG groups. Previous reports pointed to oxidative stress and subsequent elevated liver and kidney function tests accompanying levamisole and BCG administrations (3,24,32-37). Drug metabolism may be an additional cause of oxidative stress and associated elevated liver and kidney functions in levamisole group (34-37).

On the other hand, a transit depression in RBCs, Hb, and PCV was noted on the 3rd day in the levamisole group and decreased RBCs, Hb, PCV, MCV, MCH, MCHC (from the 7th day) values were detected in BCG group till the end of the study. This agreed with previous data referred to anemic changes caused by levamisole and BCG administration (23,24,38,39). They assigned these changes to the above-mentioned oxidative stress as the released free radicals attack RBCs causing their destruction and lysis. Additionally, the activated pro-inflammatory cytokines inhibit erythropoietin synthesis and subsequent RBC production and release from bone marrow (2,3,23).

Interestingly, the aforementioned clinicopathological and immunological changes were more prominent and persistent in the BCG group than in the levamisole group. As BCG evokes the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines by a powerful unique mechanism called trained immunity using the mycobacterium lipoproteins, LPS, and CpG oligonucleotide, its effect may sustain up to 3 months (3,29,33). In addition, BCG motivates adaptive immunity against unrelated pathogens and enhances T-helper1 and T-helper17 responses by another mechanism, referred to as heterologous immunity (33,40). This explains why the iron profile didn't vary in the levamisole group and it markedly changed in the BCG group in the current data. Meanwhile, the activation of the prior pro-inflammatory cytokines was more powerful in the BCG group than in the levamisole group. These cytokines trigger marked hypoferremia, hypotransferrinemia, and hyperferritinemia to reduce the iron bioavailability for the pathogens in order to prevent their growth. Thus, the immunopotiniating action of BCG increases and a subsequent increase in TIBC, UIBC, and decreased Tf sat. % were obtained in the BCG group throughout the study. Similar observations were recorded before in BCG-vaccinated neonates (38).

In contrast to levamisole and BCG, E and Se have an inhibitory effect on the pro-inflammatory cytokines and their immunostimulant effect was assigned to their nature as free radicals’ scavengers (1,4,13). So, they protected the body cells from free radicals’ harmful effects, especially (RBCs, and the liver), and increased TAC for 14 days in the current study. This led to a considerable enhancement in the red blood cells parameters and indices in E and Se group on the 3rd and 7th days, and improved TLC, neutrophils count, phagocytic activity, index, TP, Glob, throughout the research. Besides, E and Se administration ameliorated the liver functions on the 3rd and 7th days and had no adverse effect on kidney functions or iron profile in the study. Similar results were obtained before, with vitamin E and Se injections either combined or separated in different animal species (1,4,13,16,41-46).

 

Conclusion

 

BCG had the most powerful and persistent immunomodulatory effect among the studied immunostimulants, with adverse effects on the erthyrogram, liver, kidneys, and iron profile. So, it is better to inject E and Se with BCG.

 

Acknowledgment

 

Thanks, and gratitude for the staffs of the Animal Husbandry Unit in the Sustainable Development Centre of Matrouh Resources (SDCMR), and the Desert Research Center (DRC).

 

Conflict of interest

 

There is no conflict of interest.

  • XML
  • PDF 881.97 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
References
  1. Amer HA, Badr AM. Influence of antepartum administration of immunopotentiators on reproductive efficacy of buffalo and viability of their newborn. Vet Ital. 2008;44(2):373-82. [available at]
  2. Biswajit D, Suvakanta D, Chandra CR, Jashabir C. An overview of levamisole hydrochloride with immuno-stimulant activity. Am J Pharm Health Res. 2014;2(4):1-9. [available at]
  3. Mawa PA, Webb EL, Filali-Mouhim A, Nkurunungi G, Sekaly RP, Lule SA, Prentice S, Nash S, Dockrell HM, Elliott AM, Cose S. Maternal BCG scar is associated with increased infant proinflammatory immune responses. Vaccine. 2017;35(2):273-282. DOI: 1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.079
  4. Kumar A, Mehta JS, Purohit GN, Kumar A, Narula HK. Effects of non-enzymatic antioxidants on serum total proteins and its fractions in Magra rams in arid region of Rajasthan. J Pharm Innov. 2019;8(6):542-547. [available at]
  5. Firozabad A, Meybodi ZA, Mousavinasab SR, Sahebnasagh A, Jelodar MG, Karimzadeh I, Habtemariam S, Saghafi F. Efficacy and safety of levamisole treatment in clinical presentations of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):297. DOI: 1186/s12879-021-05983-2
  6. Singh PP, Pande N, Agrawal BR. Clinical and biochemical studies on endometritic repeat breeding cows following treatment with levamisole. Haryana Vet. 2017;56(1):55-57. [available at]
  7. Undiandeye UJ, Oderinde BS, El-Yuguda A, Baba SS. Immunostimulatory effect of levamisole on the immune response of goats to peste des petits ruminants (PPR) vaccination. World J Vaccines. 2014;4:88-95. DOI: 4236/wjv.2014.42011 
  8. Shawky M, Mohamed AA, Hind M, Daoud E, Farouk M. Immunological effect of levamisole as immumostimulant in vaccination with bivalent oil adjuvant foot and mouth disease vaccine in sheep. Zag Vet J. 2012;40(6):13-21. [available at]
  9. Oladele OA, Emikpe BO, Adeyefa CO, Enibe F. Effects of levamisole hydrochloride on cellular immune response and flock performance of commercial broilers. Braz J Poult Sci. 2012;14(2):233-304. DOI: 1590/S1516-635X2012000400005
  10. Pahor-Filho E, Castillo AC, Pereira NL, Pilarski F, Urbinati EC. Levamisole enhances the innate immune response and prevents increased cortisol levels in stressed pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;65:96-102. DOI: 1016/j.fsi.2017.04.003
  11. Tizard IR. Veterinary immunology. 10th USA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
  12. El-Ayouby SS, Salib OR, El-Deen HK. Use of BCG vaccine for enhancement of the immune response of sheep to Rev.1 vaccination. J Vet Med Res. 2008;18(1):6-11. DOI: 21608/jvmr.2008.77836
  13. Sigoloa S, Khazaeib R, Seidavib A, Ayasanc T, Galloa A, Prandinia A. Effects of supra-nutritional levels of vitamin E and vitamin C on growth performance and blood parameters of Japanese quails. Ital J Anim Sci. 2019;18(1):140-146. DOI: 1080/1828051X.2018.1500496
  14. Dønnem I, Randby AT, Hektoen L, Avdem F, Meling S, Våge Aø, Ådnøy T, Steinheim G, Waage S. Effect of vitamin E supplementation to ewes in late pregnancy on the rate of stillborn lambs. Small Rumin Res. 2015;125:154-162. DOI: 1016/j.smallrumres.2015.02.012
  15. Politis I. Reevaluation of vitamin E supplementation of dairy cows: Bioavailability, animal health and milk quality. Anim. 2012;6(9):1427-1434. DOI: 1017/S1751731112000225
  16. El-Shahat KH, Abdel Monem UM. Effects of dietary supplementation with vitamin E and /or selenium on metabolic and reproductive performance of Egyptian Baladi ewes under subtropical conditions. World Appl Sci J. 2011;12(9):1492-1499. [available at]
  17. Ziaei N. Effect of selenium and vitamin E supplementation on reproductive indices and biochemical metabolites in Raieni goats. J Appl Anim Res. 2015;43(4):426-430. DOI: 1080/09712119.2014.980415
  18. Anugua S, Petersson-Wolfe CS, Combs Jr GF, Petersson KH. Effect of vitamin E on the immune system of ewes during late pregnancy and lactation. Small Rumin Res. 2013;111(1-3):83- 89. DOI: 1016/j.smallrumres.2012.10.010
  19. Alhidary IA, Shini S, Al Jassim R, Abudabos AM, Gaughan JB. Effects of selenium and vitamin E on performance, physiological response, and selenium balance in heat-stressed sheep. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:576-588. DOI: 2527/jas.2014-8419
  20. Jackson P, Cockcroft P. Clinical examination of farm animals. USA: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
  21. Feldman BF, Zinkl JC, Jain NC. Schalm's veterinary hematology. 5th London: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000.
  22. Wilkinson PC. Techniques in clinical immunology. 2nd London: Black well scientific publications; 1981.
  23. Mohamed EH, Baiomy AA, Ibrahim ZS, Soliman MM. Modulatory effects of levamisole and garlic oil on the immune response of Wistar rats: Biochemical, immunohistochemical, molecular and immunological study. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14(3):2755-63. DOI: 3892/mmr.2016.5551
  24. Refat SA, Abo El –Fetouh EH, El-Rashidy RM, Samay OM. Biochemical and pathological effects of closantel and levamisole in female rabbits. Benha Vet Med J. 2011;22(2):136-144. [available at]
  25. Sadigh-Eteghad S, Khayat-Nuri H, Abadi N, Ghavami S, Golabi M, Shanebandi D. Synergetic effects of oral administration of levamisole and Echinacea purpurea on immune response in Wistar rat. Res Vet Sci. 2011;91(1):82-85. DOI: 1016/j.rvsc.2010.07.027
  26. Brook B, Schaltz-Buchholzer F, Ben-Othman R, Kollmann T, Amenyogbe N. A place for neutrophils in the beneficial pathogen-agnostic effects of the BCG vaccine. Vaccine. 2022;40(11):1534-1539. DOI: 1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.092
  27. Mohri M, Seifi HA, Zamani SH. Effects of oral administration of levamisole on non-specific immunity, serum proteins and health in normal colostrum-fed neonatal dairy calves. Comp Clin Path. 2005;13:132-136. DOI: 1007/s00580-004-0528-0
  28. Salbok AC. Hematological parameters after oral administrated of levamisole with its activity on nonspecific immunity and total serum protein in sheep. Kufa J Vet Sci. 2015;6(1):15-19. [available at]
  29. Iqbal NT, Hussain R. Non-specific immunity of BCG vaccine: A perspective of BCG immunotherapy. Trials Vaccinol. 2014;3:143-149. DOI: 1016/j.trivac.2014.08.002
  30. Eshra MA, Mahmoud AA, Elshemey TM, Abdurrahman AH, Abbas OM. A trial for vaccination of sheep against caseous lymphadentitis using oil adjuvant bacterin enhanced by bacillus Calmette-guerin vaccine. Alex J Vet Sci. 2018;57(1):140-147. DOI: 5455/ajvs.283455
  31. Tanner R, Villarreal-Ramos B, Vordermeier HM, McShane H. The humoral immune response to BCG vaccination. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1317. DOI: 3389/fimmu.2019.01317
  32. Chethan GE, Kumar De U, Garkhal J, Sircar S, Malik YP, Sahoo NR, Verma MR. Immunomodulating dose of levamisole stimulates innate immune response and prevents intestinal damage in porcine rotavirus diarrhea: A restricted-randomized, single-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019;51(6):1455-1465. DOI: 1007/s11250-019-01833-1
  33. Kleinnijenhuis J, Quintin J, Preijers F, Benn CS, Joosten LA, Jacobs C, Van Loenhout J, Xavier RJ, Aaby P, Van Der Meer JW, Van Crevel R. Long-lasting effects of BCG vaccination on both heterologous Th1/Th17 responses and innate trained immunity. J Innate Immun. 2014;6(2):152-58. DOI: 1159/000355628
  34. EL-Sawy AF, EL-Maddawy Zh, Mohamed NA. Adverse effects of nitroxynil in comparison with levamisole on male rats. Alex J Vet Sci. 2015;47:148-157. DOI: 5455/ajvs.199012
  35. Mahmoud AK, Ahmed ZA. Effect of toxic dose of levamisole on some hematological parameters, liver and kidney functions in lamb. Int J Sci Nat. 2017;8(3):542-548. [available at]
  36. Hoogenboom LA, Webb H, Tullus K, Waters A. The effect of levamisole on kidney function in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2021;36:3799-3802. DOI: 1007/s00467-021-05231-4
  37. Veltkamp F, Bökenkamp A, Slaats J, Hamer H, Bouts AM, Consortium L. Levamisole causes a transient increase in plasma creatinine levels but does not affect kidney function based on cystatin C. Pediatr Nephrol. 2022;37(10):2515-2519. DOI: 1007/s00467-022-05547-9
  38. Prentice S, Webb EL, Dockrell HM, Kaleebu P, Elliott AM, Cose S. Investigating the non-specific effects of BCG vaccination on the innate immune system in Ugandan neonates: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020;16:149. DOI: 1186/s13063-015-0682-5
  39. Kuropka P, Lesków A, Małolepsza-Jarmołowska K, Dobrzynski M, Tarnowska M, Majda J, Janeczek M, Zybura-Wszoła K, Gamian A. Effect of a single and triple dose of levamisole on hematological parameters in controlled inflammation model. Anim. 2022;12:2110. DOI: 3390/ani12162110 
  40. Libraty DH, Zhang L, Woda M, Acosta LP, Obcena A, Brion JD, Capeding RZ. Neonatal BCG vaccination is associated with enhanced T-helper 1 immune responses to heterologous infant vaccines. Trials Vaccinol. 2014;3:1-5. DOI: 1016/j.trivac.2013.11.004
  41. Soliman, E. Dose-response of vitamin E and selenium injection on growth performance, physiological and immune responses in Ossimi lambs. Egypt J Sheep Goats Sci. 2015;10(1):1-14. [available at]
  42. Mohamed MY, Ibrahim EM, Abd El-Mola AM. Effect of selenium yeast and/or vitamin E supplemented rations on some physiological responses of post-lambing Ossimi ewes under two different housing systems. Egypt J Nutr Feeds. 2017;20(3):361-378. DOI: 21608/EJNF.2017.75221
  43. Gamil NM, Mohamed SM, Abou-Bakr DA, Elsaid BS. Effect of vitamin E on the progression of renal ischemia perfusion injury in female rats. Al-Azhar Med J. 2017;46(4):781-792. DOI: 12816/0045166
  44. Hadree DH, Farhan AA, Fadhil RM. Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of Zingiber officinale alcoholic extract and vitamin E on liver damage induced by paracetamol drug in males of New Zealand rabbits. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2022;36(I):1-5. DOI: 33899/ijvs.2022.134933.2418
  45. Mohammed SA, Ali AA. Effect of selenium nanoparticles against protoscoleces of Echinococcus granulosus in vitro and hydatid cysts in mice. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2022;36(I):195-202. DOI: 33899/ijvs.2022.135838.2535
  46. Taha AN, Ismail HK. The amelioration of vitamin E on histological changes of rabbit’s brain treated with zinc oxide nanoparticles. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2023;37(1):95-104. DOI: 33899/ijvs.2022.133599.2265
    • Article View: 255
    • PDF Download: 104
Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Volume 37, Issue 3 - Issue Serial Number 3
July 2023
Page 765-773
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 881.97 K
History
  • Received: 21 October 2022
  • Revised: 08 November 2022
  • Accepted: 30 April 2023
  • Published: 01 July 2023
Share
Export Citation
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 255
  • PDF Download: 104

APA

Darwish, A. A., & Eldakroury, M. F. (2023). clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37(3), 765-773. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2023.136587.2595

MLA

Asmaa A. Darwish; Mohamed F. Eldakroury. "clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs". Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37, 3, 2023, 765-773. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2023.136587.2595

HARVARD

Darwish, A. A., Eldakroury, M. F. (2023). 'clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs', Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 37(3), pp. 765-773. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2023.136587.2595

VANCOUVER

Darwish, A. A., Eldakroury, M. F. clinicopathological evaluation of some immunostimulants' effects in Barki lambs. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2023; 37(3): 765-773. doi: 10.33899/ijvs.2023.136587.2595

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Glossary
  • Sitemap

News

  • IJVS in the first rank during Iraqi Science day 2023-01-30

 

© 2023, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus