Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Editorial Staff

Facts and Figures

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

A comparison between different laboratory methods and stains for detection microfilaremic dogs

Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2023, Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 171-175
10.33899/ijvs.2022.133610.2267

Abstract

For microscopical and statistical evaluation of different laboratory methods and stains for detecting circulating microfilariae of Dirofilaria immitis in ten naturally infected local stray dog’s positive to canine heartworm Ag ELISA kit. All blood samples were examined by three methods modified Knott's technique, serum concentration test, and Türk's solution concentration test and three laboratory stains methylene blue, giemsa, and acridine orange stains were used to dye the precipitate of the modified Knott's technique. Results showed that the slides prepared from the serum were easy to examine (there are no erythrocytes) compared with the slides prepared from the precipitate of the modified Knott's technique. The slides prepared using the Türk's solution were more transparent and freer of cell debris. The length and width of the microfilariae detected by the three methods did not change significantly. Our conclusion from this study is that Türk's solution concentration test and the serum concentration test can be used in place of the modified Knott's technique to detect microfilaremic dogs. Acridine orange staining can also substitute for methylene blue and giemsa stains for faster results.
Keywords:
Main Subjects:

Introduction

 

Dirofilaria immitis infection or canine cardiac dirofilariasis (heartworm disease) is a zoonotic nematode that infects dogs' hearts, pulmonary arteries, and other canids (1). It causes respiratory (pulmonary hypertension, embolization, allergic pneumonitis, eosinophilic granulomas), cardiac (Myocardial hypertrophy, in some animals, congestive heart failure due to high right ventricle afterload), and immune complex glomerulonephropathy (2,3). D. immitis is transmitted by various mosquitoes of the genera Culex, Aedes, Anopheles and Ochlerotatus (4-6). The laboratory diagnosis of canine cardiac dirofilariasisin live animals is made through the finding of microfilariae (Direct and concentration methods) or direct ELISA or heartworm antigen test kits (7-9) and eventually confirmed by molecular analyses (10,11). The modified Knott's technique is based on the concentration method, and it is a test of choice for the differentiation of species (12). Modified Knott's technique is performed by diluting 1 ml of blood in 9ml of 2% formalin, which breaks down erythrocytes for better readability and maintains microfilariae for morphometric methods (13). The microfilariae of D. Units are currently differentiated by their size in Knott's preparations (7). Previous studies suggest that 2% acetic acid can be used in place of the 2% formalin fixative for a more straightforward disposal of liquid waste and lower potential health risks (14,15). Acetic acid-like formalin has hemolytic properties; it is used as a hemolytic reagent in Türk's solution for the total white blood cell count (16). Acridine orange is an inexpensive fluorescence dye used in laboratory investigation and research applications (17-20). Due to the high sensitivity of the acridine orange stain, it has been widely used for rapid screening of biological samples having external contamination with microorganisms such as bacterial cells in cerebrospinal fluid (21), and malaria in the blood smear (22). The present study aimed to compare modified Knott's technique, serum concentration, and Türk's solution concentration method for detection of microfilaria of D. immitis in dogs and to investigate the suitability of Giemsa and acridine orange stains as a substitute to methylene blue in the modified Knott's technique for discovery of microfilaremic animals.

 

Material and methods

 

Ethical approve

The study was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of Veterinary Medicine College, University of Mosul (UM.VET.2021.17 decision number in 6/9/2021).

 

Sample collection

During the period from October 2021 to January 2022, a five ml of blood was sampled via the cephalic vein from a ten naturally infected local stray dogs (positive with the canine heartworm Ag ELISA kit, DRG International Inc., USA, according to manufacturer's instructions) with an age range of 1 to 7 years. Three milliliters of blood were transferred to a tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The remaining blood was emptied into a non-EDTA (plain tube) and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for5 minutes to obtain serum.

 

Modified Knott's technique

Sirois et al. (23) described the following modifications, briefly, two milliliters of blood were mixed with 18 milliliters of 2% formalin, then shaken thoroughly to hemolyze the blood and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and 3 thin smears were prepared from sediment. The smears were air-dried and fixed in anhydrous (absolute) methanol for 2 minutes, and the first and second smears were stained with methylene blue as mentioned in Coles (13), and Giemsa stains 10% as mentioned in Newton and Wright (24), respectively. The third smear was stained with acridine orange for 2 minutes, as mentioned in Gray et al. (25). The first and second smears were examined under a light microscope at 100× and 400× magnifications, but regarding smear was examined under a fluorescent microscope at 100× and 400×magnifications.

 

Türk'ssolution concentration test

One milliliter of blood was added to 9 milliliters of Türk's solution (0.2 milliliters of gentian violet 1% + 0.3 milliliters of acetic acid 100 % to 0.950 milliliters of distilled water) (13), mixed by inversion and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded. The sediment was observed under a light microscope at 100× and 400× magnifications.

 

Serum concentration test

A thin smear was prepared, air-dried, fixed with absolute methanol for 2 minutes, then stained with Giemsa stain 10 % for 10 minutes, and then examined under a light microscope at 100× and 400× magnifications Hadi and Al-Zahawi (26). Body length (from the front end to the tail) and diameter with an ocular micrometer of 10 microfilariae in each smear were determined Magnis et al. (27), Heidari et al.(28).

 

Statistical analysis

It was performed by two-way analysis of variance to detect the changes in the length and width of microfilariae in the different laboratory tests, and the difference in the percentages between the vari­ous stains was assessed by using the Chi-square test using SPSS version 11.5 software for windows. A statistically significant association between variables exists when P

 

Results

 

All concentration tests applied in the current study were positive for 10 samples. Slides prepared using the Türk's solution concentration test were clearer and freer of cellular debris than slides prepared by the modified Knott's technique (Figures 1 and 2). Slides prepared from serum appeared to be easy to examine (without erythrocytes) (Figure 3).

 

 

 

Figure 1: A blood smear reveals D. immitis microfilariae in a dog with heartworm disease (modified Knott's technique, 100×) under a light microscope.

 

 

 

Figure 2: A blood smear reveals D. immitis microfilariae in a dog with heartworm disease (Türk's solution concentration test, 100×) under a light microscope.

 

 

 

Figure 3: A blood smear reveals D. immitis microfilariae in a dog with heartworm disease (Serum concentration test, 100×) under a light microscope.

 

There were no significant changes in the length and width of the microfilariae detected by the three methods (Table 1). Examination of stained smears prepared with modified Knott's technique sediment revealed that 100% of the microfilariae were stained with acridine orange (Figure 4), while 70 and 40% of the microfilariae were stained with Giemsa and methylene blue stains, respectively.

 

Table 1: Measurements of microfilariae (n=10) recorded by various concentration tests

 

Tests

Mean±SD

Length (μm)

Width (μm)

Modified Knott's test

515±90.1*

9.8±2.1*

Türk's solution test

519±88.0*

8.9±1.4*

Serum test

484±92.0*

9.2±1.5*

* No significantly, at P> 0.05.

 

 

 

Figure 4: Acridine orange stain under a fluorescent microscope at 100× magnifications.

 

Discussion

 

Accurate diagnosis of D.immitis infestation is essential for disease management and control transmission to other animals and humans. The current guidelines from the American Heartworm Society (7) recommend using the heartworm antigen test and concentration test to detect microfilariae to confirm canine cardiac dirofilariasis.

In the current study, smears prepared by Türk's solution concentration test were clearer and freer of cellular debris than slides prepared using the modified Knott's technique, while the slides prepared from concentrated serum appeared to be easier to examine. In contrast, based on previous studies, the modified Knott's technique remains more valuable than the buffy coat method, wet mount, and thick and thin blood smears in diagnosing canine cardiac dirofilariasis (29,30). In the modified Knott's technique, Ohishiet al. (31) examined acetic acid, acetone, saponin, formalin, benzalkonium hydrochloride, and distilled water for their hemolytic action and established that acetone was most excellent. Recently, acetic acid (15) and glacial acetic acid (32) have become safe and suitable substitutes for formalin.

Türk's solution consists of acetic acid, which is responsible for the hemolysis, and crystal violet to stain the remaining leukocytes, making them easier to see and count (16,33,34). Therefore, Türk's solution concentration test appeared to be an appropriate substitute to modify Knott's technique. Hemolysis is an advantage of the modified Knott's technique due to the hypotonicity of 2% formalin and 2% acetic acid. This improves slide readability by removing most erythrocytes from the sample (13,35). Therefore, the slides prepared from concentrated serum appeared easy to examine (No erythrocytes).

In the modified Knott's technique, acridine orange staining appears to be a favorable alternative to methylene blue. Hansen et al. (36) described acridine orange staining as a fluorochrome stain for the detection of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in bovine babesiosis (37,38). Ravindran et al. (39) described the acridine orange staining technique as an accurate, simple, and rapid screening of many blood samples. It was also reported that time for identification of first parasite was only 1/3 by acridine orange staining as compared to giemsa-stained smears (40,41). This suggests that acridine orange staining is a reliable way to detect cardiac microfilaremia in dogs.

 

Conclusions

 

The current study provides uncomplicated, economical, and quick methods (Türk's solution concentration test and the serum concentration test) to detect the microfilaremic dogs, and acridine orange staining is a suitable substitute for methylene blue and Giemsa stains in the modified Knott's technique.

 

Acknowledgments

 

This article is derived from a Master's thesis supported by the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul.

 

Conflict of interest

 

The author declares no conflict of interest in the manuscript.

  1. The current study provides uncomplicated, economical, and quick methods to detect the microfilaremic dogs.
  2. Türk's solution concentration test and the serum concentration test was used in current study.
  3. Acridine orange staining appeared to be a fitting alternate for methylene blue in the modified Knott's technique.

  1. Simon F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchon R, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carreton E. Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):507-44. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00012-12
  2. Noack S, John H, Douglas S, Carithers RK, Paul MS. Heartworm disease: Overview, intervention, and industry perspective. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2021;16:65-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2021.03.004
  3. Dearsley EJ, O’Handley RM, Caraguel CGB. Is canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) endemic to South Australia?. Aust Vet J. 2019;97(6):191-196. DOI: 10.1111/avj.12814
  4. Tiffany D,Tran BM, Nelms ML, Koschik J, Scott T. Prevalence of filarial parasites in field-caught mosquitoes in northwestern California. J Vector Ecol. 2022;47(1):61-68. DOI: 10.52707/1081-1710-47.1.61
  5. Maggi RG, Krämer FA. Review on the occurrence of companion vector-borne diseases in pet animals in Latin America. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(145):32-37. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3407-x
  6. Bendas AJR, Branco AS, Alberigi BRS, Paiva JP, Miranda MGN, Mendes-de-Almeida F, Labarthe N. Mosquito abundance in a Dirofilaria immitis hotspot in the eastern state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep.2019;18:1-4.DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100320
  7. American Heartworm Society. Current Canine Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) Infection in Dogs. 2020. [available at]
  8. Gruntmeir JM, Thompson NM, Long MT, Blagburn BL, Walden HDS. Detection of heartworm antigen without cross-reactivity to helminths and protozoa following heat treatment of canine serum. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):71. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04573-6
  9. Alobaidii W A, Zaki Z D M, Hasan M. Detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in cats in Mosul city. Iraqi J of Vet Sci. 2022;36(1):57-60. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.128997.1616
  10. Rojas A, Rojas D, Montenegro VM, Baneth G. Detection of Dirofilaria immitis and other arthropod-borne filarioids by an HRM real-time qPCR, blood-concentrating techniques and a serological assay in dogs from Costa Rica. Parasit Vect. 2015;8(1):170. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0783-8
  11. de Andrade VM, Martiniano NOM, da SilvaPP. Molecular characterization of canine filarioids in a previously non-endemic area of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2022;121(3):925-932. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07433-7
  12. Mahmood MS, Alobaidii WA. Molecular detection of Trypanosoma species in sheep and goats in Mosul city. Iraqi J of Vet Sci. 2022;36(2):445-449.DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.130488.1835.
  13. Coles EH. Veterinary clinical pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1986. 360 -364 p. 
  14. Beane FLE, Blair A, Lubin JH, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Hoover RN. Mortality from lymphohematopoietic malignancies among workers in formaldehyde industries: The national cancer institute cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):751-761. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp096
  15. Evans CC, Bradner JL, Savadelis MD, Nelson CT, Moorhead AR. Acetic acid as an alternative reagent in the modified Knott test. Vet Parasitol. 2019;276(1):108975. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.108975
  16. Becker M, Moritz A, Giger U. Comparative clinical study of canine and feline total blood cell count results with seven in-clinic and two commercial laboratory hematology analyzers. Vet Clin Pathol. 2008;37(4):373-384. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00085.x
  17. Chandra BS, Rajkumar K, Barathidasan R, Vijayalakshmi P. Acridine orange staining technique - A quick diagnostic for Babesia gibsoni Infection. Intas Poli Vet. 2018;19(2):328. DOI: 10.596061883
  18. Abubakari AA, Abdulraheemia IA, Nassar SA. A trial study on a mixture of acridine and giemsa stains and modified quantitative buffy coat for detection of malaria parasites. Int J Biol Chem Sci. 2019;13(4):2074-2081. [available at]
  19. Kimura M, Teramoto I, Chan CW, Idris ZMD, Kongere J, Kagaya W, Kawamoto F, Asada R, Isozumi R, Kaneko A. Improvement of malaria diagnostic system based on acridine orange staining. Malar J. 2018;17(72):2-6. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2214-8
  20. Aghwan SS, Al-Bakri HS, Albaqqal SM. Comparison the efficiency of different techniques for the diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in slaughtered ewes. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(1):19-23. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.127058.1452
  21. Fazii P, Ciancaglini E, Riario S, Forza G. Differential fluorescent staining method for detection of bacteria in blood cultures cerebrospinal fluid and other clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;21(5):373-378. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-002-0731-3
  22. Nandwani S, Mathur M, Rawat S. Evaluation of the direct acridine orange staining method and QBC test for diagnosis of malaria in Delhi. India J Commun Dis. 2004;35(4):279-282. [available at]
  23. Sirois M, College A, Georgia N. Laboratory procedures for veterinary technicians. 7th ed. New Jersey: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. 328 p.
  24. Newton WL, Wright WH. The occurrence of a dog filariid other than Dirofilaria immitis in the United States. J Parasitol. 1956;42(3):246-58. DOI: 10.2307/3274849. PMid:13332492
  25. Gary WL, Leland SR, John H. Cross H. Rapid diagnosis of Brugiamalayi and Wuchereria bancrofti filariasis by an acridine orange/microhematocrit tube technique. J Parasitol. 1990;76(2):278-281.[available at]
  26. Hadi A, Al-Zahawi F. Diagnosis of microfilariae in human by modified Knott techniquein Iraq. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):6510-6514.[available at]
  27. Magnis J, Lorentz S, Guardone L. Morphometric analyses of canine blood microfilariae isolated by the Knott's test enables Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens species-specific and Acanthocheilonema (syn. Dipetalonema) genus-specific diagnosis. Parasit Vect. 2013;48(6):2-5. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-48
  28. Heidari Z, Kia EB, Arzamani K, Sharifdini M, Mobedi I, Zarei Z, Kamranrashani B. Morphological and molecular identification of Dirofilaria immitis from Jackal (Canis aureus) in North Khorasan, northeast Iran. J Vect Borne Dis. 2015;52(4):329-33.[available at]
  29. Ahmed A M, AlBakri H S.Phynotypic and genotypic identification of Eimeria species in backyard chicken in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(1):41-46. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2021.130487.1834
  30. Henry LG, Brunson KJ, Walden HS, Wenzlow N, Beachboard SE, Barr K, Long MT. Comparison of six commercial antigen kits for detection of Dirofilaria immitis infections in canines with necropsy-confirmed heartworm status. Vet Parasitol. 2018;254:178-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.037
  31. Ogbaje CI, Danjuma A. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2017;3(4):338-344. DOI: 10.5455/javar.2016.c170
  32. Ohishi I, Kobayashi S, Kume A. Studies on the diagnosis of canine filariasis. III. Concentration of microfilariae in the test blood. JAVMA. 1959;12(4):149-153. DOI: 10.12935/jvma1951.12.149
  33. Long SA, Rhinehart J, Shrake J, Marsh A. Feasibility and comparative analysis of Dirofilaria immitis microfilaria freezing and fixation for student instruction and assessment of clinical parasitology skills. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-2248-3
  34. Bjorner M, Zhu L. A minimally invasive, low-stress method for serial blood collection in aging mice. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis. 2019;9(1):1647400. DOI: 10.1080/20010001.2019.1647400
  35. Mohri M, Sharifi K, Eidi S. Hematology and serum biochemistry of Holstein dairy calves: Age related changes and comparison with blood composition in adults. Res Vet Sci. 2007;83(1):30-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.10.017
  36. Thrall MA, Baker DC, Campbell TW, Dewicola D, Feltman M, Lassen ED, Rebar A, Weiser G. Veterinary hematology and clinical chemistry. 2nd ed. NY: Lippincott Williams wilking; 2004. 9-20 p.
  37. Hansen WD, Hunter DT, Richards DE, Allred L. Acridine orange staining of blood parasites. J Parasitol. 1970;56(2):386-387. [available at]
  38. Esther MD, Eric MD, Lawrence S, James MD. New staining technique for diagnosing babesia species. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144(2):228. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/144.sippl2.288
  39. Al-Badrani B, Hammed S. Uses of modified buffy coat method as a tool for diagnosis of bovine hemoparasites. Egypt J Vet Sci. 2022;53(1):65-73. DOI: 10.21608/ejvs.2021.96527.1298
  40. Ravindran R, Lakshmanan B, Sreekumar C, John L, Gomathinayagam S, Mishra A, Tewari AK, Rao JR. Acridine orange staining for quick detection of blood parasites. J Vet Parasitol. 2007;21(1):85-86. [available at]
  41. Israr M, Haq M, Memon FA, Saeed HFU, Qamar H. Detection of malaria through light microscope with fluorescent microscopy and interference filter. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol. 2022;26(01):184-1188. ‏[available at]

  • Article View: 132
  • PDF Download: 102