Abstract
This trial was aimed to determine the prevalence of renal coccidiosis in domestic geese and ducks in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. One hundred and thirty birds of both sexes and different ages were randomly purchased from many localities of Nineveh governorate during the period between 2017and 2018. According to geese and ducks' age, the overall infection was 70.00% and 51.66%, respectively, 74.35% for geese and 53.19% for ducks Eimeria truncata in geese showed that 49 (70 %) were positive, while 31(51.66%) were positive for ducks. Cloacal fecal samples for Eimeria truncata oocytes' were tested by flotation technique revealed that 22.85% were positive for geese and 16.66% for ducks. The dimensions of Eimeria truncata development stages (schizonts, macrogametes, microgametes, and oocytes) were measured. The histological sections of the infected geese and ducks' kidneys showed the different developmental stages of the Eimeria truncata parasite with various pathological changes.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Highlights
1-Ducks could be affected by Eimeria truncate, the causative agent of renal coccidiosis by the same species that affect geese.
2-Geese are affected with Eimeria truncate in higher prevalence than ducks.
3-The parasite could cause injury to the endothelial cells of blood vessels and then penetrate the wall toward interstitial tissue answering the question of how the parasite could reach renal tissue.
4-It is the first time that renal coccidiosis in geese and ducks are reported in Nineveh governorate, Iraq.
Full Text
Survey and diagnostic study of Eimeria truncata in geese and ducks
Ahlam F. Al-Taee
Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
ahlaam.altaee@gmail.com, 0000-0001-5862-3719
2020-10-06
2021-02-27
Abstract
This trial was aimed to determine the prevalence of renal coccidiosis in domestic geese and ducks in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. One hundred and thirty birds of both sexes and different ages were randomly purchased from many localities of Nineveh governorate during the period between 2017and 2018. According to geese and ducks' age, the overall infection was 70.00% and 51.66%, respectively, 74.35% for geese and 53.19% for ducks Eimeria truncata in geese showed that 49 (70 %) were positive, while 31(51.66%) were positive for ducks. Cloacal fecal samples for Eimeria truncata oocytes' were tested by flotation technique revealed that 22.85% were positive for geese and 16.66% for ducks. The dimensions of Eimeria truncata development stages (schizonts, macrogametes, microgametes, and oocytes) were measured. The histological sections of the infected geese and ducks' kidneys showed the different developmental stages of the Eimeria truncata parasite with various pathological changes.
Keywords: Renal coccidiosis, Eimeria truncata, Geese, Ducks
دراسة مسحیة وتشخیصیة لطفیلیالایمیریا ترونکاتا فی الإوز والبط
أحلام فتحی الطائی
فرع الأحیاء المجهریة، کلیة الطب البیطری، جامعة الموصل، الموصل، العراق
الخلاصة
یهدف البحث إلى تحدید مدى انتشار الاکریات الکلویة فی کل من الإوز والبط المحلی فی محافظة نینوى، العراق. إذ تم شراء مائة وثلاثین طیر من کلا النوعین مع اختلاف الجنس والعمر من مناطق مختلفة فی محافظة نینوى، خلال الفترة من 2017 إلى 2018. کانت الإصابة الإجمالیة للإوز والبط حسب أعمارهم 70.00% و 51.66% على التوالی، حیث بلغت للأعمار اقل من 6 اشهر 74.35% للإوز و 53.19% للبط على التوالی بینما بلغت 64.51% و 46.16 % لکلیهما عند عمر 7 شهور فأکثر. أظهر توزیع الإصابة بالاکریات الکلویة فی کلا الجنسین أن 75.55%، و 54.50% من إناث الإوز والبط، و 60.00% و 47.82% من ذکور الإوز والبط کانت موجبة على التوالی. أظهر مسح طبعات أنسجة الکلى بوجود طفیلی الایمیریا ترونکاتا فی 49 (70%) للإوز بینما کانت موجبة 31 (51.66%) للبط. تم فحص عینات البراز للکشف عن أکیاس البیض لطفیلی الایمیریا ترونکاتا بتقنیة الطفو وأن 22.85% کانت موجبة للإوز و16.66% للبط. تم قیاس أبعاد مراحل تطورالایمیریا ترونکاتا (المفلوقات، الأمشاج الکبیرة، الأمشاج الدقیقة وأکیاس البیض). أظهرت المقاطع النسیجیة لکلیتی الإوز والبط المصاب بوجود مراحل تکاثر الطفیلی الایمیریا ترونکاتا المختلفة مع تغیرات مرضیة عدیدة.
Introduction
Coccidiosis is a worldwide disease caused by a single celled parasite belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa, family Eimeriidae. The parasite could enter the duck's and geese's gut cells to reproduce, meronts and gamonts occur in the epithelial cells of kidney tubules. The degree of damage will depend on how many coccidial (oocystes) have been taken in addition to the feverish environmental condition (1). Many adverse health conditions were recorded, like reducing nutrient absorption, weight loss, and diarrhea, or even bloody diarrhea in severe cases, leading to mortality 5-10% (2-5). Coccidial eggs (oocystes) have a very thick wall and can resist severe environmental stresses and disinfectants. Intestinal coccidiosis in geese and ducks was reported here in Iraq (and elsewhere throughout the world (6) renal coccidiosis was described all over the world (7-9) but does not yet report in Nineveh governorate. Renal coccidiosis has been reported in 10 members of the Order Anseriformes, two Procellariiformes, and one member in each of the Charadriiformes and Strigiformes (10). The mysterious transmission of intestinal coccidiosis to kidney coccidiosis by infection with E. truncata has not been resolved as was mentioned by Oksanen (11). Infected geese and ducks shed the oocysts with their ureters, sporont (zygote) present in oocyst divides and forms four sporocysts, each containing two infective sporozoites within 1-5 days. Infective oocystes could be ingested by birds feeding in a contaminated environment. The Parasite reaches kidneys and junction of ureters, where sexual reproduction produces oocystes. Heavily infected birds may die due to kidney failure. The life cycle is continued by infected birds shedding oocystes into the environment (4). Ducks and geese are highly efficient in the production of eggs and animal protein. In Iraq and here in Nineveh governorate, the usefulness of ducks and geese in providing a part of the animal protein urged the population in breeding these kinds of birds in small herds on farms and homes. Most renal coccidiosis reports in ducks and geese are asymptomatic birds or birds that show minor physiological or pathological changes due to the parasite. Young birds and those stressed by various conditions are most likely to have clinical cases of renal coccidiosis. Mortality has occurred in free-ranging wild geese and ducklings. Disease in domestic geese is usually acute, lasts only 2-3 days, and can kill large flock segments (12,13).
However, no reports about renal coccidiosis in ducks and geese were reported in Nineveh governorate; therefore, this study was carried out to determine renal coccidiosis frequency in domestic ducks and geese in Nineveh governorate, Iraq.
Materials and methods
Sixty local domestic ducks and seventy geese of different ages and sexes were randomly selected from various localities of Nineveh governorate, Al-Hamdania, Al-Khazer, Al-Salamia, Bazwea, Kokjali, and from some local markets, during the period from October 2017 to October 2018. All birds were delivered to the laboratory of parasitology in the college of veterinary medicine. Birds were sacrificed in the laboratory and necropsied for renal coccidiosis; affected kidneys were freshly sampled. The diagnosis was based on the observation of the clinical signs, necropsy renal findings, pathological and histopathological changes of the kidneys and ureters, microscopic features of the development stages, and impression smears of the affected kidneys and flotation fecal. Kidneys were almost enlarged in size; they were removed and impressed from at least five different regions to get the wet tissue smears, which were stained by Giemsa stain (Romanowsky) for detecting the developmental stages of coccidian parasite (4,14). Both kidneys and ureters were cut to get samples from the anterior, middle, and posterior portions for histopathological by fixing 10% phosphate-buffered formalin (15). Fixed tissues were sectioned at 5 µm by using standard histological procedures and stained with Harris’s hematoxylin-eosin stain (H&E). Morphometric measurements of smears were examined for identifying different developmental coccidian stages using a light microscope at 40X and 100X magnification (16).
Results
The age of birds tested for renal coccidiosis influences the prevalence of their infectivity in both types, geese, and ducks. The distribution of Eimeria truncata in these birds to their different ages (Table 1). From the Table, it is evident that goslings and ducklings less than 6 months of age had a higher prevalence of renal coccidiosis compared to those of 7 and more. Geese showed a higher prevalence than ducks. The overall prevalence for geese and ducks according to their age were 70.00% and 51.66%, respectively, while the age distribution of renal coccidiosis for both of them was as follows, 74.35% for geese and 53.19 % for ducks at
Table 1: Prevalence of renal coccidiosis in infected geese and ducks according to their age
Age (months) |
Geese |
Ducks |
||
No examined |
No(%) +ve |
No examined |
No(%) +ve |
|
< 6 |
39 |
29(74.35%) |
47 |
25(53.19%) |
≥7 |
31 |
20(64.51%) |
13 |
6(46.15%) |
Total |
70 |
49(700.0%) |
60 |
31(51.66%) |
In addition to age, sex affected the prevalence of renal coccidiosis in both geese and ducks. The distribution of Eimeria truncata in these birds (Table 2). Females were infected more than males in their renal coccidiosis, but geese in the meantime had a higher prevalence than ducks. Sex distributions of renal coccidiosis were 75.55% and 54.05% for female geese and ducks, respectively, and were 60.00% and 47.82% for male geese and ducks, respectively.
Table 2: Prevalence of renal coccidiosis in infected geese and ducks according to gender
Age (months) |
Geese |
Ducks |
||
No examined |
No(%) +ve |
No examined |
No(%) +ve |
|
Female |
45 |
34(75.55%) |
37 |
20(54.05%) |
Male |
25 |
15(60.00%) |
23 |
11(47.82%) |
Total |
70 |
49(70.00%) |
60 |
31(51.66) |
Impression smears
In geese the table 3 shows that out of 70 geese examined through impression smears, 49(%70) were positive for renal coccidiosis.Impression smears of the infected geese kidneys showed the different reproductive stages of the Eimeria truncate parasite, macrogametocyte, microgametocyte, and schizonts (Figure 1).
In ducks the table 3 shows that out of 60 ducks examined for renal coccidiosis through impression smears, 31(51.66%) were positive for the presence of Eimeria truncata development stages. Impression smears of the infected ducks' kidneys showed different reproductive stages of the Eimeria truncata parasite, macrogametocyte, microgametocyte, and schizonts (Figure 2).
Table 3: Renal coccidiosis prevalence by kidney impression
Birds |
No examined |
Kidney’s impression |
|
No. +ve |
% |
||
Geese |
70 |
49 |
70 |
Duck |
60 |
31 |
51.66 |
Figure 1: Impression smear of geese kidney infected with Eimeria truncata with different developmental stages. (Giemsa stain, 1000 X). A= Macrogametocyte (MAG); B=Microgametocyte (MIG) and Schizonte (SCH); C and D= Schizonts(SCH).
Figure 2: Impression smears showing different reproductive stages (blue arrow) of Eimeria truncata in duck’s kidneys. (Giemsa stain, 1000X).
Fecal examination
In geese fecal examination (flotation) for the detection of Eimeria truncata oocyst in geese showed that16/70 (22.85%) were positive. In ducks the fecal examination (flotation) for the detection of Eimeria truncata oocyst in ducks showed that 10/60 (16.66%) were positive (Table 4).
Table 4: Eimeria truncata in infected by fecal examination
Birds |
No examined |
Kidney’s impression |
|
No. +ve |
% |
||
Geese |
70 |
16 |
22.85 |
Duck |
60 |
10 |
16.66 |
Coccidian oocytes
The Coccidian oocyst identified in this study was Eimeria truncata depending on the oocystes morphology 9 for both geese and ducks (Figures 3 and 4).Eimeria truncata oocystes appear as ovoid to ellipsoidal, asymmetric with smooth walls and truncated narrow end. The mean dimension of many oocytes varied between 27.5 by 17.5µm.
Figure 3: Unsporulated Eimeria truncata oocyst from kidney (H&E, 400X).
Figure 4: Sporulated Eimeria truncata oocyst isolated from the feces (400X).
Histopathological measurements
In geese the dimensions of Eimeria truncata endogenous development stages in kidney impression smears, kidney histological sections, and urethra histological sections of infected geese were shown in 49(70%) of tested geese (Tables 5-7). All development stages were ellipsoids, ovoid, spherical or sub spherical in shape, being less in their width than their length. In duck the dimensions of Eimeria truncata endogenous development stages in kidney impression smears, kidney histological sections, and urethra histological sections 30 (51.66%) of infected ducks (Tables 5-7). All development stages were ellipsoids, ovoid, spherical, or sub spherical in shape being less in their width than their length measurements. To summarize all the dimensions as mentioned earlier in tables 5-7, it is obvious that all developmental stages of Eimeria truncata in infected ducks concerning kidney impression smears, kidney histological sections, and urethra histological sections were more in comparison to those of Eimeria truncata developmental stages of infected geese.
Table 5: Measurements of Eimeria truncata developmental stages in kidney impression smears
|
Score |
Macrogamete |
Microgamete |
Schizont |
Oocyst |
||||
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
||
Gees |
Length (µ) |
7.2±1.51 |
5.5-11.5 |
5.6±1.02 |
4-7 |
8.4±2.73 |
5-12 |
6.6±1.18 |
5-8.6 |
Width (µ) |
6.3±1.24 |
3.5-9.6 |
5.6±7.83 |
3.3 |
7.7±2.68 |
4-10.6 |
3.5±0.63 |
2.5-4 |
|
Duck |
Length (µ) |
7.6±1.97 |
6.1-9.6 |
5.6±0.77 |
4.4-7.4 |
6.9±0.94 |
6.3-8.1 |
7.1±0.37 |
6.8-7.7 |
Width (µ) |
7.0±0.64 |
7.2-9 |
4.7±0.61 |
3.9-5.7 |
6.1±0.80 |
4.2-7 |
3.2±0.38 |
3-4 |
Table 6: Measurements of Eimeria truncata developmental stages in kidney histological sections
|
Score |
Macrogamete |
Microgamete |
Schizont |
Oocyst |
||||
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
||
Gees |
Length (µ) |
6.5±1.73 |
5-11.5 |
5.2±0.68 |
4.2-5.7 |
6.7±1.97 |
4.2-9.4 |
4.64±0.97 |
3.1-5.9 |
Width (µ) |
5.9±1.41 |
4.5-8.7 |
5.2±1.25 |
3.3-7.8 |
6.5±2.12 |
2.8-11 |
3.14±1.43 |
2.3-6.0 |
|
Duck |
Length (µ) |
6.5±1.34 |
4.7-9.6 |
5.7±0.80 |
3.7-7.4 |
6.7±1.67 |
4.7-11.5 |
5.1±1.68 |
3-7.7 |
Width (µ) |
6.1±1.23 |
4-8.5 |
5.7±0.80 |
3-6.4 |
6.7±1.67 |
4.3-9.4 |
4.9±2.38 |
2.3-6.8 |
Table 7: Measurements of Eimeria truncata developmental stages in urethra histological sections of infected geese.
|
Score |
Macrogamete |
Microgamete |
Schizont |
Oocyst |
||||
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
Mean ± SD |
Rang |
||
Gees |
Length (µ) |
5.5±0.61 |
4-6 |
4.8±0.48 |
4-5 |
5.4±0.48 |
5-6 |
5.0±0.47 |
4-8 |
Width (µ) |
4.2±0.61 |
3-5 |
3.6±0.48 |
3-4 |
4.8±0.48 |
4-5 |
3.3±0.47 |
3-4 |
|
Duck |
Length (µ) |
4.6±0.41 |
4-5 |
3.8±0.43 |
3-4 |
4.7±0.69 |
4-6 |
5.5±0.44 |
5-6 |
Width (µ) |
4.8±0.40 |
4-6 |
4.6±0.41 |
4-5 |
5.0±0.53 |
4-6 |
4.0±0.44 |
3.5-5 |
Histopathology findings in geese
Histological sections of geese kidney show the presence of various reproductive stages of the parasite Eimeria truncata and (merozoites) in the interstitial tissue and inside the glomerulus, since the parasite could cause injury to the endothelial cells of blood vessels and then penetrate the wall toward interstitial tissue resulting in coagulative necrosis in the renal tubules and shrinkage of glomerulus lumen (Figure 5), vacuole in the epithelial cells lining of renal tubules (Figure 6) and cystic kidney with infiltration of inflammatory cells (Figure 7).
Figure 5: Histological section of geese kidney showing the presence of merozoites inside the glomerulus (1) with the presence of shrinkage in the glomerular lumen (2) and the presence of coagulative necrosis in the renal tubule (3). The various reproductive stages of the parasite Eimeria truncata (4). The presence of merozoites in the interstitial tissue of the kidney (5) Narrowing of the kidney tubule lumen (6) (H&E. 1000X).
Figure 6: Histological section of geese kidney shows the presence of vacuole in the epithelial cells lining the renal tubule (1) with the presence of merozoites in the interstitial tissue (2) as well as the presence of coagulative necrosis (3). (H&E. 1000X).
Figure 7: Histological section of geese kidney showing the formation of Cystic kidney (1), necrosis of epithelial cell lining of renal tubules (2), and infiltration of inflammatory cells (3). (H&E. 1000X).
Histopathology findings in ducks
Histological sections of duck’s kidney show swelling with vacuole degeneration and coagulative necrosis of epithelial cell lining tubules resulting in sloughing of these cells, accompanied by shrinkage of Broman’s capsule and the presence of hyaline cast material with infiltration of inflammatory cells (Figures 8-10).
Figure 8: Histological section of duck’s kidney showing acute cell swelling (1), coagulative necrosis of epithelial cell lining tubules (2), presence of hyaline cast material (3). (H&E 400X).
Figure 9: Histological section of duck’s kidney showing coagulative necrosis of epithelial cells lining renal tubules (1), and sloughing of these cells (2), with the detachment of basement membrane (3), and infiltration of inflammatory cells (4), (H&E 400X).
Figure 10: Sever coagulative necrosis of epithelial lining of renal tubules (1), hydropic degeneration of renal epithelial cells (2), necrosis of mesangial cells of glomerulus (3) and infiltration of inflammatory cells (4), (H&E 400X).
Discussion
In Nineveh governorate, no attention has been paid for a long time to renal coccidiosis in geese and ducks despite its great economic importance due to the prophylactic and treatment measures, lowering bird’s production and the mortalities it causes. No Previous study was accomplished about this subject here in the governorate, although renal and intestinal coccidiosis in both geese and ducks were reported all over the world (17). Intestinal coccidiosis was the only type reported here Al-Taee, et. al, (6). The significance of renal coccidiosis caused by Eimeria truncate in geese and ducks has been mostly related to the serious losses through kidney damage and mortalities, which may rise to 80-100% (18).
The purchased geese and ducks assigned for the study were aged from 3 months and more, the most predicted age of goslings and duckling’s infection with renal coccidiosis (19). In Nineveh governorate, nesting geese and ducks are not practiced on a large scale. So morbidity and mortality percentages from the affected birds with renal coccidiosis could not be estimated or recorded. However, it still and should be regarded an important issue due to the easy way of oocyst transmission through the feed, water, litter, and soil since the purchased geese and ducks were from those fed on pasture and claimed to be suffered from malnutrition, exposition to many different parasitic infections and other concurrent diseases and immunosuppression. The rapidity of sporulation of unsporulated oocytes outside the body (approximately 3 days) after shedding from kidneys through ureters and passed via cloaca with feces increase the possibility of fecal contamination of these birds to get an infection on a wide scale, especially under the favorable environmental conditions of wet litter or soil and warm temperature 21-32ºC, causing the high rate of deaths in goslings, ducklings, sub-adults and adult birds both accidentally or through breeding colonies (20) in addition to the role of persons, vehicles, wheels insects and others in transmitting infection (5). The significance of their importance is their significant economic importance to the rural geese and duck’s holders. Both type of birds, when attained for necropsy, were in poor performance, ruffled feathers, anemic, depressed, weakened, listlessness, anorexic, and so they experienced clinical infection since they suffered from whitish -yellowish diarrhea, the signs described by many others in ducks and geese infected with renal coccidiosis (21,22). These signs were at different severity among necropsied birds, agreed with the reports declared that renal coccidiosis is on one side asymptomatic disease in some birds, or may show minor physiological or pathological changes (23). Relatively few worldwide reports about heavy losses of renal coccidiosis in ducks comparing to those in geese (2). At necropsy, birds were emaciated with obvious changes in kidneys characterized by enlargement, extensively damaged, pale, containing discrete foci of infection that may coalesce into a mottled appearance. These changes were also mentioned by Gelberg (24). Our diagnosis of the disease was based on the described clinical signs, kidney lesions, impression smears, histological findings, and the shape of the fecal oocytes.
Although different species of Emeria like E. boschadi, E. somatarie were reported (20,19), Eimeria trancata is one of the species that can be found in both geese and ducks (5), as we found here in our study with oocyst averaged 27.5X17.5µm, ovoid to ellipsoid in shape with smooth wall and narrow truncated ends. In spite that some authors reported about the uncertainty of renal coccidiosis in ducks, but Saif et. al, (2) and Fitz-Coy (5) noticed that E. truncata was isolated from renal coccidiosis of domestic ducks and geese. This is the first report of renal coccidiosis in geese and ducks caused by Eimeria truncate in Nineveh governorate. Another coccidian Eimeria (Eimeria somateriae) with mean dimensions of 33.5 by 14.8 µm was also reported in ducklings (19, 20), and Eimeria gaviae with a mean diameter of 36.6 µm (15 measurements with a range of 30.3 to 40.1 µm) (25) compared to Eimeria truncata.
In this study, the prevalence of renal coccidiosis in geese and ducks were 70.00% and 51.66%, respectively, confirmed by kidneys necropsy and impression smears, compared to 22.85% and 16.66% by fecal flotation test. The incompatibility of these results confirmed by the findings of Gomis et. al, (26) who stated that dropping examination is not a good indicator of the severity of renal coccidiosis infection in individual geese and ducks.
The severity of renal coccidiosis may vary according to the level of infection, age, sex, the strain of the parasite or host, and even intercurrent infection (27). Our findings reviled that immature geese and ducks (< 6 months) showed to be more infected than adults (≥ 7 months), results confirmed by Benjamin and John (12), in that young birds are most likely to have clinical cases of renal coccidiosis (28). Regarding the gender of these birds in this study, the prevalence of infection with renal coccidiosis in females was higher than that of males, being 49%and 31% in geese and ducks respectively, 70% and 51% in their kidney impression smears, while the oocytes shedding was 22.85% and 16% respectively, compared to 6.8% in Canada geese from three locations in the Mississippi Flyway (12), 37.8% in Turkey (22), and 45.3%in Canada (9). The reason may be largely traced to the poor hygienic and nutritional conditions under which geese and ducks were confounded in our study.
The histological sections of the infected bird kidneys in our sections showed eventually highly destructive changes due to Eimeria truncata parasite's presence and its different reproductive stages with numerous sloughed ureteral epithelial cells also described by Zachary (29,30). Histologic changes in kidneys in both bird species may predispose to rapid weight loss and emaciation, with high mortality percentages reaching up to 80 or even 100% reported in severe outbreaks by Saif et. al, (2). It should be stressed that renal coccidiosis in Nineveh governorate imposes a serious threat to the domestic geese and duck’s industry, and further studies should be carried out on the epidemiology of this protozoan parasite. In domestic and wild ducks and geese (due to the less economic profit from wild types of them) and natural infections as those studies on protozoal infections accomplished in Iraq (31,32), for more understanding controlling this disease and other protozoal diseases (33).
Conclusion
It could be concluded that ducks could also be infected with the same species of Eimeria truncate that affect geese.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest with regards to the manuscript
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the College of Veterinary Medicine for supporting, assisting, and providing space and facilities.
10. Wobeser G. Renal coccidiosis in mallard and pintail ducks. J Wild-life Dis. 1974;10:249-256.
11. Oksanen A. Mortality associated with renal coccidiosis in juvenile wild greylag geese (Anser anser anser). J Wildlife DIS. 1994;30:554-556. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-30.4.554
12. Benjamin NT, John LC. Renal coccidiosis in interior Canada geese, Branta canadensis interior Todd, of the Mississippi. Valley population. 1984;20(4):272-278. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-20.4.272
13. Merck CO. The Merck Veterinary Manual. 8th ed. Merial: CRC press; 2008. 300 p.
14. Islam MR, Shaikh H, Baki MA. Prevalence and pathology of helminth parasites in domestic ducks of Bangladesh. Vet Parasitol. 988;29(1):73-77. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90009-X
15. Luna LG. Manual of histology staining methods of the armed forces institute of pathology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1968. 258 p.
16. Foreyt WI. Veterinary parasitology. 5th ed. USA: Iowa State University Press; 2001. 5-9 p.
17. Gajadhar AA, Wobeser G, Stockdale PG. Coccidia of domestic and wild waterfowl (Anseriformes). Canadian J Zool. 2011;61(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1139/z83-001
18. Bowman DB. Georgis' parasitology for veterinarians. 10th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2014. 98-103 p.
19. Oksanen A. Mortality Associated with Renal Coccidiosis in Juvenile Wild Greylag Geese (Anser anser anser). J Wildlife Dis. 1994:30(4):554-6.DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-30.4.554
20. Mendenhall V, Milne H. Factors affecting duckling survival of eiders Somateria mollissima in northeast Scotland Ibis. Inter J Avian Sci. 2008;127(2):148-158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1985.tb05051.x
21. Yabin Dai, Mei L, Nongyue H, Jianping T. The life cycle and pathogenicity of Eimeria fulva Farr, 1953 in domestic goslings. Acta Protozool. 2005;44(4):311-319. DOI: 10.1645/GE-476R1.1
22. Entzeroth R, Scholtyseck E, Sezen IY. Fine structural study of Eimeria truncata from the domestic goose (Anser anser dom) Z Parasitenkd. 1981;66(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00941939
23. Urquhart GM, Armour J, Duncan JL, Dunn AM, Jennings FW. Veterinary parasitology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wily Black Well; 2003. 276-277 p.
24. Gelberg HB. Alimentary system and the peritoneum, omentum, mesentery, and peritoneal cavity. In: Zachary JF, ed. Pathological basis of veterinary disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier Inc; 2017. 382 p.
25. Michael JY, Nicole LG, John RF. Description of a new Eimeria sp. and associated lesions in the kidneys of double-crested cormorants (Phalocrocorax auritus). J Parasitol. 2002;88(6):1230-3. DOI: 10.1645/0022-3395
26. Gomis S, Didiuk AB, Neufeld J, Wobeser G. Renal coccidiosis and other parasitologic conditions in lesser snow goose goslings at Thaanne River, west coast Hudson Bay. J Wildl Dis. 1996;32(3):498-504. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-32.3.498
27. Pellerdy LP. Coccidia and coccidiosis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey; 1974. 155-374 p.
28. Woolcock, BM. Diseases of the duck. In: Boulianne M (ed). Avian disease manual. 7th ed. Jacksonville: American Association of Avian Pathologists; 2013. 233 p.
29. Zachary JF. Mechanisms of microbial infection. In: Zachary JF (ed). Pathological basis of veterinary disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier Inc; 2017. 237 p.
30. Taha AM. Comparative histological and histochemical study of the ileum in two different birds. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(3):479-487. DOI:10.33899/ijvs.2020.127046.1447
31. Mohammad NH. Study on the blood protozoa in geese. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2019;34(1):23-27. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.125499.1028
32. Mohammad ZA. Some chewing lice (Phthiraptera) species as ectoparasites infested aquatic birds with a new record of three
33. species from AI-Sanah marsh/southern Iraq. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2020;34(1):173-180. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2019.125499.1028
34. Al-Lahaibi BY, Hasan MH, Al-Taee AF. Incidence of internal parasites of the slaughtered local breeds of ducks and geese. Iraqi J Vet Sci. 2021;35(1):39-44. DOI: 10.33899/ijvs.2020.126242.1272